March, the Month of Awareness


“An important place to begin in philosophy is this : a clear perception of one’s own ruling principle.” – Epictetus, Discourses, 1.26.15

“Above all, it is necessary for a person to have a true self-estimate, for we commonly think we can do more than we really can.” – Seneca, On Tranquility of Mind, 5.2

If we do not focus on our internal integration – on self-awareness – we risk external disintegration. – The Daily Stoic

“No slavery is more disgraceful than one which is self-imposed.” – Seneca

Maybe the coffee hasn’t kicked in yet, but I’m having trouble adding anything to these four quotes.

Screw it, call it an exercise in being laconic.

6 woes.gif
Know yourself.

Stu asks: is coaching inter-disciplinary, or ANTI-disciplinary? Coaching would be “too vast”, a discipline that involves all disciplines. Ultimately, I think that’s just a question of semantics, but I think I see where he’s coming from. The Organ and I came up with Emergent BioPsychoSocial Engineering.

Maybe it’s worth nailing the language we use to describe coaching. Sapir-Wholf? Related : go watch Arrival, by Denis Villeneuve.

As I finished this paper on teaching emergent processes, I got caught a bit off guard by the idea that complex systems are ones where the micro level elements all follow the same simple rules. An easy example is a murmuration of starlings (now you know the name for a group of starlings, BOOM, bonus fact you didn’t know). You wouldn’t be able to predict the group/macro behavior from learning the rule first (a key feature of emergent phenomena, and a warning against reductionism), but it’s a basic rule that governs the micro behavior : Each individual bird orients themselves to the average speed and direction of his neighbors.

What could be the basic rule that governs the micro-level of the human system?

Readiness : the current functional state of an athlete that determines the ability to effectively achieve their performance potential (from Windows of Trainability, by the people at Omegawave. This is a download link to the pdf)

I would posit that an athlete’s readiness is the emergent (macro) phenomena that comes from the various (micro) systems obeying the same rule : achieve homeostasis. Related thought from The Cyborg Hartman : Create resiliency to recover from the impact of stressors and create resistance to minimize the impact of stressors.


I think what’s making it difficult to zoom out and study coaching in this manner is the fact that we’ve done a pretty great job of studying the individual human subsystems. Just as we are warned about reductionism in neuroscience, where a focus on the micro (neurons) can only teach us so much about the macro (human behavior), we should apply the same caution at our more zoomed-out level.

Like a good fractal, you keep finding the same patterns no matter how much you zoom in or out. We are composed of a complex system of systems (cardiovascular, respiratory, endocrine, digestive…), each of which is a complex system. Zooming out, we are also a micro-level player in the greater system of our culture, inside the complex system of humanity.

I need to delve more into Snowden’s Cynefin framework. Rereading this article, something that now piques my interest :

One of the early theories of complexity is that complex phenomena arise from simple rules. Consider the rules for the flocking behavior of birds: Fly to the center of the flock, match speed, and avoid collision. This simple-rule theory was applied to industrial modeling and production early on, and it promised much; but it did not deliver in isolation. More recently, some thinkers and practitioners have started to argue that human complex systems are very different from those in nature and cannot be modeled in the same ways because of human unpredictability and intellect.


You need to have an open mind, you need to consider lots of different ideas, and the fact that systems which appear to be quite different may in fact in some underlying way be very similar. That is a very big leap of imagination for some people and some professionals who have devoted their lives to a particular field, but it is a leap that you need to be able to make to make any progress in this field. – John Rundle

John Rundle is a professor at UC Davis in earthquake prediction using Dynamical Systems. I feel validated in my seemingly scattered studying.

Random stuff

  • Lacrymal Release Technique. You heard it here first.
  • The more senses you integrate, the better the retention.
  • Communication involves two parties, so if it breaks down, consider everybody’s contribution
    • Did the listener do a good job of receiving the information?
    • Did the sender do a good job of conveying his message?
    • Focus on what is under your control. Easy to say when you’re the one receiving, but I feel that we tend to blame the receiver when we are the ones tasked with explaining something. Take responsibility.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s